AIG Enhanced Fund Victims Action Group

Action Group for AIG Enhanced Fund Victims

Sharing information for the 1000s of victims of AIG's Enhanced fund. Aiming to give the fundholders a voice in what happens to their money.

Forum

Hobie

Still here, still seeking redress 95 Replies

Started by Hobie. Last reply by jane sanders Jul 23.

Stephen H

18 months of hell HELP!!!!!!! 2 Replies

Started by Stephen H. Last reply by Hobie Jun 16.

david atkinson

AIG/ALICO DISTRIBUTION 1 Reply

Started by david atkinson. Last reply by R S[BW] May 27.

AM

Any exposure to Greek banks in the PRF?banks 2 Replies

Started by AM. Last reply by toast May 10.

Fingers Crossed

Coutts & Sir Keith Mills 5 Replies

Started by Fingers Crossed. Last reply by Malcolm P Ward Apr 13.

R S[BW]

AIG TO SELL ALLICO TO METLIFE 1 Reply

Started by R S[BW]. Last reply by flower Mar 17.

Grahame Goodyer

Historic Enhanced fund data and fact sheets 2 Replies

Started by Grahame Goodyer. Last reply by Grahame Goodyer Feb 25.

Steve Wilson

NEW TAX IMPLICATIONS AND NEW BOND *** MUST READ ***

Started by Steve Wilson Feb 11.

John Upex

January 2010 - status update 3 Replies

Started by John Upex. Last reply by anthea johnson Jan 21.

R S[BW]

September Unit Price 2 Replies

Started by R S[BW]. Last reply by R S[BW] Sep. 24, 2009.

Members

  • Claire
  • jane sanders
  • Noel Tann
  • Peter Rhodes
  • spencer malcolm smart
  • Roger William Carey
  • Jo Chin
  • Keith Gilchrist
  • Bis
  • patrick sharman
  • John Edgar
  • Brian T
  • damian bailey
  • GAVIN MCBRIDE
  • Mike Alderson
  • Paul Anthony
 

AIG Enhanced Fund Action Group - moving on

ALL OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS WEBSITE ARE THOSE OF THE MEMBERS WHO CHOOSE TO CONTRIBUTE. THEY SHOULD NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS OFFERING SPECIFIC “FINANCIAL, TAX or LEGAL ADVICE”. INVESTORS MUST OBTAIN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL ADVICE.

THE LATEST PRF PRICE FROM ALICO - CLICK HERE

UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE > 16th June 2010 < UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE

More complaints are now sitting on the desk at FOS, and they have identified what they believe is a key failing by some of the banks. As most folk know, we asked FOS, the FSA and the OFT to consider this case for what is known as a Wider Implications review. The FSA has been investigating AIG's actions in running & marketing the fund for some time now - we are taking the view (along with learned specialists in the area) that no news is good news. That's no guarantee that the FSA will rule against AIG (sorry, Alico) but it means they clearly have had some work to do to evaluate the position.

Industry experts here know how long this takes; the plus in using the FSA and FOS is that they have the authority to force a settlement to all investors if they believe that to be warranted, even those who have not complained or - more particularly - those struggling with complaints themselves.

Please remember, complaints can only be submitted to FOS within six months of the final response from your bank/adviser.....normally. We have just reviewed a case, however, where there are potential extenuating circumstances that we have asked Barclays to address by re-opening the complaint.

A Barclays investor has had a FOS adjudication in his favour in March of this year and the investor loss was significantly in excess of £100,000. As expected, Barclays don't agree with the adjudication from the Ombudsman Service, but the assessment is quite black & white.


Having forwarded the members documents to the FSA the process they are following is to investigate the way AIG ran the fund in the first instance. Pending the outcome of that, tied into a specimen complaint, FOS are holding off adjudications. We are not expecting an outcome from the FSA before April.

As we have said before, this will take time. If there are still unresolved distress cases caused by this then please contact us directly as we can provide 'support' and guidance.



OUT OF THE MOUTHS OF BABES AND BANKERS....

The FSA rulebook says:

Rule 14.3.2 specifically stipulates that the risks must be provided

‘in sufficient detail to enable the client to take investment decisions on an informed basis’.

Barclays Bank compliance says:

" A product is not inappropriate or unsuitable simply because an investor does not understand it, particularly in circumstances where the investor has granted a discretionary mandate to the banker in connection with investment decisions. Put bluntly, there is no requirement that the investor should understand matters at all."

We wrote to Marcus Agius, the chairman of Barclays, asking if he agreed with his Barclays Wealth's interpretation. The response came from.......Barclays Wealth.

If you have anything in a similar vein, please let us have a copy. Investor confidentiality is maintained at all times, and we are registered with the Information Commissioner.





;*******************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************

We are always cleaning out the membership list. If you find you have been inadvertently 'banned', please email me. ADVISERS et al: please do not advertise your services in posts: email me your details and we can add them to the list in the reference library. Thanks.

Hobie






Blog Posts

Hobie

FOS & FSA: the Wider Implications Process.

Posted by Hobie on July 6, 2009 at 5:53pm — 6 Comments

Hobie

Update on the PRF - if you prefer fact to comment

Posted by Hobie on July 26, 2009 at 10:06am

Hobie

The FSA's definition of cash

Posted by Hobie on July 2, 2009 at 3:30pm

Hobie

How to get the refund of your original subscription

Posted by Hobie on July 1, 2009 at 8:30am — 3 Comments

Hobie

How to get your client file

Posted by Hobie on July 1, 2009 at 8:24am

Latest Activity

jane sanders TO SEE HOW THINGS ARE
July 23
jane sanders added a blog post
Good morning to you I have just had a client touch base with me regarding what has been going on. You may or may not have heard of me. My name is Jane Sanders, and I am the individual who blew the whistle on the goings on at FOS, whilst I worked th…
June 29
Stephen - please call me on 0207 440 6252 and I should be able to help.
June 16
Stephen H added a discussion
it is almost 18 months since I submitted my complaint to the FOS, I am at a total loss and in a living hell, I have received a string of generalised generic letters telling me nothing. Does anyone know what is happening with AIG and in particular th…
June 1
It’s pathetic given the strength of recovery in the bond. When the original offer of distributions was made nobody could have known then how many more defaults it might incur as things stand there has been no further default but the suggested amount…
May 27
david atkinson added a discussion
Got the latest figures this morning from barclays wealth (sic) regarding  distribution looks like we will be getting £3.000 for every  £100.000 on 5 june depending on tax implications
May 24
The underpin should make this irrelevant, but broadly speaking I believe there is minimal direct exposure to Greek debt
May 10
OR whether the banks we do have bonds with have excessive exposure to Greek bonds.
May 10
AM added a discussion
Does anyone know if we have direct exposure to Greek banks in the PRF or whether the 
May 10
Hobie Is this indemnity the reason why in spite of the strong recovery in the bond value we are not receiving the distributions we expected
May 2
Here's the Citywire report - it is simply as expected, no more & no less. As the new owner of the firm Metlife runs the fund. The indemnity will simply be because there is a guaranteed future value of the PRF, with the payout being from Metlife, the…
April 26
Roger A BW added a gift to their profile page
March 30
 
 
 

© 2010   Created by Simon Galbraith   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service